This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Loan Agreement
Misrepresentation

Murris Johnson III v. Congress Mortgage Company, et al.

Published: Apr. 6, 1996 | Result Date: Jan. 12, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 7263770 –  $2,087,000

Judge

Jacqueline Taber

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

A. Charles Dell'Ario


Defendant

Samuel Holmes


Experts

Plaintiff

Scott Behiel
(technical)

Defendant

Robert Gaddis
(technical)

Facts

In January of 1991, the defendant, Congress Mortgage Company, solicited the plaintiff, Murris Johnson III, a 30-year-old handyman, to refinance his home even though the plaintiff had no income. The defendant told the plaintiff he needed a new loan because the existing lender was in FSCIC receivership. The defendant charged the plaintiff 14% interest and 15 points on the loan. The plaintiff used the loan money to pay the existing mortgage and buy another home from his widowed aunt. Within a month, the defendant also made the plaintiff a loan secured by that home. When the plaintiff was unable to make payments on either loan, two months later, the defendant made the plaintiff a third loan to cure the defaults. Within six months, the defendant initiated foreclosure on both of the properties. The plaintiff filed for bankruptcy but the defendant ultimately foreclosed on the properties in March of 1993. The plaintiff brought this action to set aside the foreclosures, void the notes and for damages under fraud and breach of fiduciary duty theories or recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a $220,000 (title) and $100,000 (fees) settlement demand. The defendant made no offer.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed loss of home equity valued at $220,000 and emotional distress as a result of the defendant's action.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years and two months after the case was filed.

Deliberation

12 hours

Poll

12-0

Length

11 days


#116381

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390