This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Failure to Accommodate
Wrongful Termination

Leslie E. Tanner v. City of San Jose

Published: Jun. 14, 2005 | Result Date: Mar. 11, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV808800 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Joseph H. Huber

Court

Santa Clara Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Randal M. Barnum


Defendant

Shannon Smyth-Mendoza

Michael J. Dodson
(Jeanette N. Little & Associates)


Experts

Plaintiff

Inna Ravkin
(medical)

Rodger Schuester
(technical)

Mercedes Conklin
(medical)

Facts

In 1997, Leslie Tanner, 46, was hired by the city of San Jose as an entry-level engineer in the utilities section of the Engineering Services Division of the Public Works Department. Shortly after being hired, Tanner claimed to have developed a gastrointestinal condition that caused such symptoms as nausea, vomiting, stomach pain and headaches. Tanner claimed that stressful situations at work aggravated his symptoms. Despite this, he continued to receive satisfactory performance reviews. Tanner was rotated out of the utilities section for one year as part of a standard training program. When he resumed work in the utilities section, he claimed he was harassed by his new immediate supervisor. Tanner complained to his immediate supervisor. His complaint was e-mailed to his other supervisors as well, however, no investigation or other actions were taken according to Tanner. As a result of further harassment and unfair criticism regarding his job performance, Tanner's gastrointestinal symptoms worsened. Tanner subsequently took time off work, at which time, a reprimand was placed in his file. Tanner then requested that he be transferred from his position. This request was denied and he was asked to resign. In 2000, Tanner sued the city of San Jose, alleging disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, harassment, retaliation and wrongful termination.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $390,000.

Specials in Evidence

$590,000

Damages

$200,000 for emotional distress.

Result

Defense

Deliberation

3.25 hours

Poll

10-2 (reasonable accommodation), 10-2 (retaliation), 11-1 (wrongful termination), 11-1 (disability discrimination), 12-0 (disparate treatment)

Length

10 days


#116585

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390