This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Disability Discrimination
Failure to Accommodate

Denise Byrd v. Santa Ana Unified School District

Published: Dec. 14, 2004 | Result Date: Oct. 12, 2004 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 03CC04129 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Ronald L. Bauer

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Roger L. Gordon
(Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein LLP)

Noah Green


Defendant

A.J. Pyka


Experts

Plaintiff

Brian H. Kleiner
(technical)

Gunner Heiser
(medical)

Andrew Pucetti
(technical)

Defendant

Alan Forbess
(technical)

Ben Kollmeyer
(technical)

Gary Stewart M.D.
(medical)

Facts

The plaintiff claimed that Santa Ana Unified School District discriminated against her on the basis of her alleged disability and failed to accommodate her on the job. The plaintiff claimed that she had a disability known as multiple chemical sensitivity (hyper sensitivity to mold) that prevented her from working when exposed to toxic mold and chemicals. The plaintiff was a teacher at the District, teaching in portable unit number 37 at Jefferson Elementary School from 1998 through 2002. In February 2001, the District discovered mold in several portable units including the plaintiff's unit 37. The District commenced remediation of all of the units. The plaintiff claimed that she became sick because of her exposure to the mold. She was off for over a year because of her mold exposure. In August 2002, she was ready to return to work and requested that she have a clean environment and specifically did not want to return to unit 37 despite its remediation. The District nevertheless put the plaintiff back into her same unit 37. She became sick again, left school and never returned, allegedly because of her illness. The plaintiff claimed that the District should have made reasonable accommodations, given her disability and sensitivity to mold.

Specials in Evidence

$170,000

Injuries

The plaintiff claimed that she was exposed to toxic mold and as a result, suffered personal injuries, including but not limited to, respiratory distress, dry eyes, dermatological disease, ear, nose and throat problems, fatigue, malaise, immuno-suppression, sensory sensitivity to chemicals, dizziness, loss of memory, a damaged larynx and emotional distress.

Deliberation

5.5 hours

Length

two weeks


#116860

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390