This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Product Liability
Design Defect/Seat Belt

Sylvia Delgado, Jose Delgado v. Kia Motors Corporation, et al.

Published: Jan. 5, 2008 | Result Date: Nov. 16, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC336729 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven M. Sepassi
(ADR Services Inc.)

Robert M.N. Palmer


Defendant

Scott J. Stockdale

Mark V. Berry
(Bowman and Brooke LLP)

Jenny A. Covington


Experts

Plaintiff

Kurt D. Weiss
(technical)

Jan Roughan R.N.
(technical)

Jacob E. Tauber M.D.
(medical)

Lawrence Miller M.D.
(medical)

David Biss
(technical)

Carley C. Ward
(technical)

Defendant

Rose Ray
(technical)

Dennis C. Schneider
(technical)

Andrew E. Levitt
(technical)

Thomas O. Tiede
(technical)

Thomas L. Hedge Jr., M.D.
(medical)

Facts

On Oct. 26, 2003, Jose Delgado was driving the family's Sephia with his wife Sylvia Delgado, 54, in the right front seat and their daughter and granddaughter in the rear seats. The front seat occupants both were using the automatic shoulder belts provided in the Sephia. An oncoming VW Jetta turned left in front of the Sephia, striking it nearly head on. Sylvia Delgado sustained a chest, abdominal and leg injuries and was hospitalized for approximately one year. No one else was seriously injured in the crash.

The Delgados sued Kia Motors Corporation and Kia Motors America alleging that the right front restraint system was defectively designed. They also sued the driver of the Jetta, who settled out of court.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs contended that the design of the Sephia's restraint system led to Sylvia Delgado's injuries, and that safer alternative design features should be incorporated into the restraint system. The plaintiff also contended that Sylvia Delgado is now permanently disabled and requires 24-hour care.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Kia asserted that the Sephia's restraint system was proven technology that was thoroughly tested. Kia contended that the injuries were a result of the negligence of the Jetta driver, severity of the crash and the physical characteristics of Sylvia Delgado.

Damages

In closing argument the plaintiffs' counsel asked the jury to award almost $5 million in past and future medical care and cost, and $8.5 million for past and future pain and suffering.

Result

Defense verdict in favor of Kia.

Deliberation

three hours

Poll

unanimous

Length

three weeks


#117264

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390