This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Discrimination
Anti-Lodging

Sipprelle, et al. v. City of Laguna Beach, et al.

Published: Jul. 3, 2010 | Result Date: Jul. 20, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:2008cv01447 Settlement –  Equitable Agreement

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Andra B. Greene
(Irell & Manella LLP)

Jill Sperber

Belinda E. Helzer

Lori E. Rifkin
(Rifkin Law Office)

Cathy T. Moses

Mark D. Rosenbaum
(Public Counsel )

Hector O. Villagra

Brian Z. Bark

Erwin Chemerinsky
(UC Berkeley School of Law)


Defendant

Philip D. Kohn
(Rutan & Tucker LLP)


Facts

Many years ago, the City of Laguna Beach enacted an "anti-sleeping" ordinance, which prohibited individuals from sleeping in public areas.

Although, the City filed an answer denying the allegations, it subsequently voluntarily repealed much of the ordinance and refrained from enforcement of state anti-lodging laws.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California (ACLU), Erwin Chemerinsky, and Irell & Manella filed suit against the City, on behalf of five individuals, alleging the ordinance led to police officers harassing, citing, and arresting homeless persons.

Result

The parties subsequently reached a settlement, under which the City denied any wrongdoing or liability but agreed not to undertake enforcement of state laws or adopt a new local ordinance relating to camping, sleeping or lodging on public property without first providing notice of its intention to do so. In the interim, the City reserved the right to enforce state laws in circumstances presenting reasonable public health, safety and welfare concerns with respect to possible harm or injury to persons or damage to property. The City eventually enacted new local ordinances. Finally, the City agreed not to oppose efforts by plaintiffs to expunge, seal and destroy records of citations and convictions under the prior ordinance.

Other Information

FILED: December 23, 2008


#117411

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390