This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Real Property
Land Use
County Ordinance

Black Rock City LLC v. Pershing County Board of Commissioners, Pat Irwin, Richard Machado, Carol Shank, Darin Bloyed and James Shirley

Published: Dec. 14, 2013 | Result Date: Nov. 6, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:12-cv-00435-RCJ-VPC Settlement –  Equitable Agreement

Court

USDC Nevada


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert Reznick

Richard Elmore

James R. Smith

Adam C. Belsky

Tamara Reid

Terry Gross
(Gross & Belsky PC)

Karen G. Johnson-McKewan
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

Ryan Micallef

Annette L. Hurst
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)


Defendant

Jim Shirley

Brent Kolvet

Brandon R. Price


Facts

Black Rock City LLC operated the Burning Man Event in Black Rock Desert, Pershing County, Nevada. It had done so annually since 1991. Burning Man was an event attended by over 50,000 people each year, aimed at encouraging communication and individual expression through art and other media. Burning Man took place on federal land for 21 years, administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Black Rock City had a permit from the Bureau allowing it to operate the event.

In 2004, Pershing County enacted an ordinance. Black Rock protested the ordinance, arguing that it couldn't be constitutionally applied to Burning Man, because it was federally permitted. Instead of litigating the matter, Black Rock and the County entered into agreements that allowed Black Rock to operate Burning Man without observing the ordinance.

However, Black Rock later claimed that the County began to impose new unnecessary and unlawful regulations on Black Rock, threatening its ability to conduct Burning Man in 2013 and onward. In 2012, the County demanded that Black Rock agree to revoke their prior 2005 and 2011 agreements, but Black Rock refused to do so. Black Rock then filed suit.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Black Rock argued that it was being denied its federal rights, and that the County was seeking to apply conflicting and preempted state law over federal law. They also claimed that the County had filed a collusive state lawsuit in order to attack Burning Man. The plaintiffs asserted causes of action for declaratory judgment regarding preemption of the county's festival statute, a declaratory judgment regarding preemption of festival laws, a declaratory judgment regarding the facial invalidity of the festival laws, and a declaratory judgment regarding the violation of Black Rock's due process rights.

Result

The parties settled, agreeing to a comprehensive long-term framework by which the County would be able to supply law enforcement services at Burning Man events. Black Rock would pay the County for the law enforcement services based on a payment chart agreed to by both parties.


#117831

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390