Jose Ramirez, Luis Gomez, Marck Mena Ortega v. Ghilotti Bros. Inc., Ghilotti Brothers Construction Inc.
Published: Oct. 26, 2013 | Result Date: Oct. 4, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:12-cv-04590-CRB Settlement – $950,000
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Gay C. Grunfeld
(Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld LLP)
Wendy E. Musell
(Wendy Musell PC)
Jenny S. Yelin
(Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld LLP)
Kathryn G. Mantoan
(Orrick, Herrington & Sucliffe LLP)
Elisa J. Stewart
(Stewart & Musell LLP)
Defendant
Michael J. Hassen
(Reallaw, APC)
An Nguyen Ruda
(Bartko LLP)
Facts
Defendant Ghilotti Bros. Inc. (GBI) is a construction firm based in San Rafael. Laborers Jose Ramirez, Luis Gomez, and Marck Mena Ortega, on behalf of a putative class, filed a class action against GBI alleging wage and hour violations under California state law and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. Judge Charles R. Breyer conditionally certified a class for federal claims on April 25, 2013, struck all of GBI's affirmative defenses, and denied GBI's motion to dismiss.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs claimed that GBI has a policy and practice of failing to pay laborers for all hours worked. In particular, plaintiffs alleged that GBI did not afford all workers statutory rest and meal periods, did not pay all required overtime wages, and required some laborers to report to GBI's yard before the official shift start time to obtain equipment, verify its readiness, load it into a truck and transport it to the job site. After the official shift end time, these laborers were required to return the equipment from the job site to the yard, see to its maintenance as needed, and store it.
Plaintiffs alleged that laborers with these loading and transport duties were not paid for work performed before and after the official shift times.
Plaintiffs claimed that defendant failed to provide meal and rest breaks within the time frames required by Industrial Welfare Commission order 16-2001.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant claimed that all wages due are paid to laborers and corrections are promptly made when laborers identify discrepancies in their wages.
Result
Defendant agreed to pay $950,000 to settle the matter and to injunctive relief including setting up a procedure to allow laborers to make a record of the time they start or end work. The settlement is to be paid in three installments.
Other Information
The settlement was signed on Aug. 8, 2013. The court entered a preliminary approval order on Oct. 4, 2013. FILING DATE: June 27, 2012 (State Court); removed by defendant in August 2012. MEDIATOR: Hon. William Cahill, retired, JAMS.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390