This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Pedestrian
Negligent Entrustment

Anne Kniffen v. Manuel Braganza Garcia aka Manuel Braganza, Zenaida Braganza, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Apr. 4, 2015 | Result Date: Feb. 16, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC522530 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central West


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Nancy P. Doumanian
(Doumanian & Associates)


Defendant

Paul A. Bigley
(Freeman, Mathis & Gary LLP)

Daniel C. Walsh
(Freeman, Mathis & Gary, LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

William L. Caton III
(medical)

Darryl R. Zengler M.A.
(technical)

Jan Roughan R.N.
(medical)

Norman Chien
(medical)

Defendant

Ramin Amirnovin M.D.
(medical)

Facts

On Jan. 11, 2013 at 1:45 p.m., plaintiff Anne Kniffen, 73, was crossing Genevieve Ave. with the assistance of a walker. Defendant Manuel Braganza Garcia was operating a 1995 Acura and was approaching Colorado Blvd. from Genevieve Ave. with the intention of turning right onto Colorado.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended defendant struck her, and that the subject accident caused her lower back condition to worsen and require a thoracolumbar reconstruction surgery. Plaintiff claimed that her medical condition was improving leading up to the subject accident.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended he made contact with plaintiff's walker as she was attempting to cross an unmarked crosswalk on Genevieve Ave. Defendant contended that plaintiff had a medical history, which included five prior lower back surgeries, and that plaintiff's medical condition was in a state of decline before the subject accident, and that the subject accident only caused a minor short term exacerbation of plaintiff's significant amount of pre-existing medical issues.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff's pre trial settlement demand increased to $2 million. Defendant did not make any further offers after the expiration of defendant's CCP 998 for $150,000.

Damages

Plaintiff asked the jury for $3,998,950 in future medical specials; $5 million in past non-economic damages, and $10 million in future non-economic damages, for a total of $18,998,950. Defendant presented multiple valuations to the jury, from $0 up to $96,000, but asked the jury for a defense verdict.

Injuries

Plaintiff was taken by ambulance from the scene to a nearby hospital, where she was released later that day. Plaintiff claimed that the subject accident caused an increase in pain management medication and a need for a multitude of medical services over the course of her 13 remaining years of life expectancy that would total $3,998,950.

Result

The jury returned a unanimous defense verdict, finding that defendant's negligence was not a substantial factor in causing harm to plaintiff.

Other Information

MEDIATOR: Hon. Russell Bostrom, ret., Judicate West. FILING DATE: Sept. 25, 2013.

Deliberation

one hour

Poll

9-3 (defendant’s negligence), 12-0 (defendant was not a substantial factor in causing harm to plaintiff)

Length

14 days


#118817

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390