United Housing Services Inc. v. Aklero Risk Analytics Inc., LoanLogics Inc., Douglas R. Sheridan
Published: Apr. 18, 2015 | Result Date: Mar. 12, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 30-2013-00681998 Verdict – Defense
Court
Orange Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Thomas A. Pistone
(Pistone Law Group LLP)
Defendant
Mark D. Magarian
(Magarian & DiMercurio APLC)
Krista L. DiMercurio
(Magarian & DiMercurio APLC)
Experts
Plaintiff
Deborah J. Ford
(technical)
Facts
Plaintiff United Housing Services Inc. sued defendants Aklero Risk Analytics Inc. and LoanLogics Inc.
The parties are in the business of quality assurance for companies that make loans, among other things.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that based on discussions about a possible merger with Aklero Risk Analytics, it allowed Aklero Risk Analytics, who later merged with LoanLogics Inc., to examine its business operations, meet with its employees, and otherwise obtain access to information it would not otherwise have shared, and that this information was protected because of a non-disclosure agreement that the parties signed.
Plaintiff alleged that in violation of the non-disclosure agreement, and in violation of various other legal obligations, defendants Aklero Risk Analytics and LoanLogics took and used confidential and proprietary business information, and with it Aklero Risk Analytics and LoanLogics were able to take employees, employees, clients, and valuable information that could be used in Aklero Risk Analytics and LoanLogics' operations.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Aklero Risk Analytics and LoanLogics denied that plaintiff allowed them to examine its business operations, or otherwise obtain access to information plaintiff would not otherwise have shared. They also denied that they took and used plaintiff's confidential and proprietary business information to take employees, clients, or valuable information that could be used in defendants' operations. Finally, they denied that they breached the terms of the non-disclosure agreement or engaged in any other unlawful conduct.
Settlement Discussions
Plaintiff demanded $1.5 million. Defendants offered $5,000 and a waiver of attorney fees and costs.
Damages
Plaintiff claimed lost profits of $9,177,464.
Result
Defense verdict.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Oct. 17, 2013.
Deliberation
one day
Length
12 days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390