This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Unfair Business Practices

Wi-Lan USA Inc., Wi-Lan Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Published: Apr. 11, 2015 | Result Date: Jan. 8, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:13-cv-00798-DMS-BLM Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David B. Weaver

Steven R. Borgman

Seth A. Lindner

Seth R. Hasenour
(McKool Smith)

Robert A. Cote

Efren Garcia

Dirk D. Thomas

Jonathan R. Yim
(McKool Smith)

Allison H. Goddard

Lawrence M. Hadley
(Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP)

Kevin R. Schubert
(McKool Smith)

Stephen M. Hash

Andrea M. Houston

Brett E. Cooper
(McKool Smith)


Defendant

Lazaro Fernandez

Jennifer Miremadi

Ashlee N. Lin
(Eisner LLP)

Miguel J. Ruiz
(Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney)

Mark C. Scarsi


Facts

Wi-Lan USA Inc. and Wi-Lan Inc. filed an infringement suit against Apple Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs accused Apple of infringing on its patents related to wireless products compliant with the 3rd Generation Partnership Project - Long Term Evolution, or 3GPP LTE, which Apple implemented on its iPhone 5 and third generation iPad.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Apple denied plaintiffs' allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. Additionally, Apple filed counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the subject patents. Apple also filed counterclaims for unclean hands, waiver and estoppel, and exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. Section 285. Accordingly, Apple moved for summary judgment.

Result

The court granted Apple's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement as to all claims and subsequently denied plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, it dismissed all remaining claims, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims without prejudice.

Other Information

FILING DATE: April 3, 2013.


#118910

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390