This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Product Liability
Rollover Crash

Misty Raley, individually and as parent and next friend of C.G., W.G. and C.A.G., minor children v. Hyundai Motor Company Ltd., Hyundai Motor America

Published: Apr. 3, 2010 | Result Date: Mar. 2, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:08-cv-00376-HE Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Western


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John M. Merritt

Michael M. Blue

Mark A. Cox
(Egolf Ferlic Martinez Harwood LLC)


Defendant

Linda G. Kaufmann

J. Derrick Teague

James A. Jennings III

Thomas N. Vanderford Jr.
(Hyundai Motor America)


Experts

Plaintiff

Brad Mathison
(technical)

Sherry Latham
(technical)

Larry G. Cox
(technical)

Stephen A. Batzer Ph.D., P.E.
(technical)

Charles P. Dickerson
(technical)

Carley C. Ward
(technical)

Donald Friedman
(technical)

William H. Muzzy III
(technical)

Shawn Smith
(medical)

Defendant

Garry S. Bahling
(technical)

Richard L. Morrison
(technical)

Geoffrey J. Germane
(technical)

James H. Raddin Jr.
(technical)

Michael E. Klima
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiff alleged that the seat belt, the roof, and the side window glazing in 1999 Hyundai Sonata was defective and negligently designed, causing or contributing to her permanent injuries (quadriplegia) sustained during a rollover crash that occurred near the intersection of Interstate 44 and S.W. 59th Street in Oklahoma City, Okla. on Dec. 19, 2003.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff claimed that the roof and pillars that support the roof were not designed to withstand the force of accidents, particularly rollovers. The plaintiff also charged that the seat belt was defectively designed so as to allow the buckle to inadvertently or inertially unlatch, allowing the plaintiff's ejection from the vehicle.

The plaintiff further alleged that the side window glazing system was defectively designed in a manner that fails to retain occupants, allowing for plaintiff's ejection from the vehicle.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendants denied that the product was defective or unreasonably dangerous. They maintained that no defect existed and that the vehicle's design complied with all applicable safety standards. The defendants further contended that plaintiff was not wearing her seat belt and that the force of the accident caused her injuries.

Following four days of Daubert hearings before the trial, the defendants successfully precluded the testimony of plaintiffs' seat belt design expert about inadvertent unlatching and the testimony of plaintiffs' roof design expert about testing performed on the Jordan Rollover System (JRS) apparatus.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed more than $10 million for future medical bills and treatment and further alleged loss of enjoyment of life and past and future pain and suffering. Finally, the plaintiff sought damages for the negligent infliction of emotional distress upon her three minor children, who were in the rollover crash and witnessed her injuries.

Result

The jury found in favor of the defendant.

Deliberation

65 minutes

Length

13 days


#119189

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390