This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
ADA
Failure to Accommodate

California Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Law School Admissions Council

Published: May 1, 2010 | Result Date: Aug. 6, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Settlement –  Equitable Agreement

Court

Fair Employment and Housing Commission


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jason R. Cale
(Office of the Attorney General)

Annmarie Billotti
(Department of Fair Employment and Housing)


Defendant

Joan E. van Tol


Facts

Erika Ewing registered to take the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT), administered by the defendant Law School Admissions Council (LSAC). Ewing requested accommodation for her diagnosed Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) of one and one half times the regular time limit to take the exam. LSAC denied her request and Ewing took the test without accommodation. Over three years, she registered for the LSAT nine times and took the exam four times, each time being denied accommodation. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) filed a complaint on her behalf.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
According to DFEH, LSAC discriminated against the disabled when it refused to accommodate Ewing's disability. Specifically, the DFEH contended that the LSAC violated the Unruh Civil Rights Act that provides equal advantages and services in all establishments doing business in California. Their refusal to accommodate Ewing, DFEH alleged, resulted in her hindered performance and lower scores on the LSAT.

Result

In a settlement, LSAC agreed, on a one-time basis, to give Ewing one and one half as much time as non-disabled applicants to take the September 2009 LSAT. Also, LSAC agreed to extend the deadline to use an exam fee waiver it previously issued Ewing for a prior testing date. In so settling, LSAC did not admit liability or acknowledge that plaintiff's allegations were valid.


#119320

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390