This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
False Advertising
Computer Processor Performance

Janet Skold, David Dossantos v. Intel Corp., Hewlett Packard Co.

Published: Dec. 6, 2014 | Result Date: Jul. 22, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1-05-CV-039231 Settlement –  $15 claims

Court

Santa Clara Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Eric H. Gibbs
(Gibbs Law Group LLP)

Kristine K. Meredith

Mike Danko
(Danko Meredith)


Defendant

Daniel C. Levin

Mirian Kim

Gregory N. Pimstone
(Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP)

Hojoon Hwang

Caroline McKay


Facts

Janet Skold and David Dossantos brought a class action against Intel Corp. and Hewlett Packard Co.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that Intel manipulated performance scores related to the release of its "Pentium 4" processor by secretly writing benchmark tests that it passed off as being developed by an independent, objective third-party. Plaintiff further alleged that these benchmarks falsely improved previous poor performance scores for the Pentium 4. Plaintiff contended that Intel's manipulation of the performance scores allowed it to charge an exaggerated price for the Pentium 4.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the allegations of plaintiffs' claims.

Result

A class-wide settlement was reached with Intel. Under the settlement, Intel agreed to pay $15 to each class member who submitted a valid claim establishing certain criteria, such as the make of the computer and the date it was purchased. Intel further agreed to donate either products or funds amounting to at least $4,000,000 to non-profit entities that would be agreed to by the parties and approved by the court. Intel also agreed to pay plaintiff's counsel fees and costs up to $16.45 million. The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement.


#120453

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390