This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
First Amendment
Fourteenth Amendment

Robert Van Tuinen v. Yosemite Community College District, Dr. Joan Smith, Jill Stearns, Michael Guerra, Brenda Thames, Becky Crow, Christine Serrano, Doe Defendant 1

Published: Apr. 19, 2014 | Result Date: Mar. 17, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1:13-cv-01630-LJO-SAB Settlement –  $50,000

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Rochelle L. Wilcox

Ronald G. London

Lisa B. Zycherman

Bob Corn-Revere
(Davis Wright Tremaine LLP)


Defendant

Michael E. Lehman
(Ericksen Arbuthnot)

Eileen O'Hare-Anderson

David Urban
(Liebert Cassidy Whitmore)


Facts

Robert Van Tuinen filed a complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as damages, against Yosemite Community College District, Dr. Joan Smith, Jill Stearns, Michael Guerra, Brenda Thames, Becky Crow, and Christine Serrano, in connection with an incident that occurred on Sept. 17, 2013.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Van Tuinen contended that on Constitution Day 2013, he had attempted to distribute copies of the United States Constitution to fellow Modesto Junior College students. He contended that he was in a public area of the campus, when a security officer and a College clerical staff member told him to stop. Then he was told he would only be allowed to distribute the materials at a "free speech zone" and only after he had scheduled his planned distribution by providing notice at least five days in advance.

Van Tuinen claimed that the College's restrictions impinged on his rights to free expression. He also claimed that the rules were facially overbroad and prohibited the exercise of free expression on campus. Van Tuinen asserted causes of action for violating his freedom of speech and due process under both the California constitution and the U.S. Constitution.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that although it was prepared to deny many of the factual allegations in plaintiff's complaint, and assert affirmative defenses, it decided to settle the matter early and revise existing policies and procedures.

Result

The parties agreed to settle the dispute for $50,000. In addition, the College also agreed to change its free speech area policy. The College no longer requires students to seek approval for free expression on campus. In addition, it also listed areas designated for free speech.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Oct. 10, 2013.


#121070

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390