This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Age Discrimination
Race Discrimination

Carlos Ramirez v. R. James Nicholson

Published: Oct. 25, 2008 | Result Date: May 9, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 06CV00546(JTM) Settlement –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Paul D. Jackson

Raul Cadena


Defendant

Cindy M. Cipriani
(Office of the U.S. Attorney)

Beth A. Cluckey

Karen P. Hewitt
(Jones Day)

Carol C. Lam


Experts

Plaintiff

Tony Yip
(technical)

Dominick Addario
(medical)

Defendant

Mark A. Kalish, M.D.
(medical)

Harold Copans
(medical)

Facts

In 1956, plaintiff Carlos Ramirez, 72, entered the Navy as an E-1. In 1986, he retired from the military as a Master Chief, E-9. He commenced work as a file clerk for the Dept. of Veteran's Affairs the following year.

In 2002, plaintiff became romantically involved with a Caucasian female co-worker who was 20 years his junior. He informed his second-level supervisor, Michael Dusenberry, of the relationship. At that point, plaintiff was advised to also notify his first-line supervisor, Mark Daniels, of the relationship, as a job transfer was necessary to ensure that the couple no longer worked under the same chain of command.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the informed Daniels, who berated him. Afterward, plaintiff, who is Filipino, experienced harassment, age and race discrimination at the hands of the agency, namely by defendant R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs. He was given an unjustified reprimand, placed on a performance improvement plan, and demoted.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that the plaintiff failed to timely report his romantic relationship with a subordinate employee, as he waited six months to notify his superiors. Further, plaintiff was demoted due to his unsatisfactory job performance. For instance, defendant claimed that plaintiff provided inadequate training to his Triage Team and submitted inaccurate weekly reports.

Result

Judgment was rendered in favor of the defense.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 14, 2006.

Poll

8-0

Length

six days


#121238

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390