This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Sexual Abuse
School Negligence

Jane Doe v. School District

Published: Nov. 15, 2008 | Result Date: Jul. 9, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Settlement –  $800,000

Court

L.A. Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David M. Ring M.D.
(Taylor & Ring)

Angela Gilmartin

Louanne MasryWeeks
(Paul Mones, P.C.)


Defendant

Ric C. Ottaiano

Courtney L. Hylton
(Hylton & Associates)


Facts

A 14-year-old female special education student was sexually assaulted (raped) at her high school by two male special education students on two different days during school hours. The assaults occurred under a building's stairwell. The first assault was on a Friday, the second on the following Monday.

Although 14 years old, the plaintiff functioned at the level of a nine year old.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the school district was negligent in failing to supervise its special education students. The incidents took place during a sixth-period class and the teacher knew or should have known the students were missing from the class but still on campus somewhere. Also, one of the male perpetrators had a history of significant disciplinary problems while attending that high school, and the school should have supervised him very closely. Further, the plaintiff attempted to report the first sexual assault to administrators, but no one took the time to press her about what exactly she was trying to report.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The school district contended that its supervision was appropriate and that it could not possibly supervise every child at every moment during the school day, even if the children were special education students. The district also contended that the sexual incidents between the three students were consensual. And, even if school security had been in close vicinity to where the assaults occurred, one of the students acted as a "lookout" and would have thwarted anyone from the school seeing any actual sexual conduct.

The school district also disputed the nature and extent of plaintiff's injuries.

Injuries

The plaintiff suffered post-traumatic stress disorder and severe emotional distress.

Result

The case settled for $800,000.


#121378

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390