This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Breach of Contract
Business Law
Fraud

Keith Anderson v. Industrial Data Link Corporation and Gilbert Vasquez

Published: Sep. 3, 1994 | Result Date: Jul. 11, 1994 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 639286 –  $1,245,000

Judge

Alpha L. Montgomery

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dale R. Larabee


Defendant

Ivor Thomas


Experts

Plaintiff

Tore Tjersland
(technical)

Defendant

Richard E. Evans
(technical)

Facts

On August 29, 1986, Plaintiff Keith Anderson and Defendants Industrial Data Link (IDL) and Gilbert Vasquez, the sole owner of IDL, signed an employment letter whereby Vasquez allegedly promised Anderson stock in IDL as part of an executive salary package. In November 1986, Anderson began working for Defendants. IDL was moderately successful from 1986 to 1991 at which time Plaintiff allegedly demanded that IDL give him 9 percent of its stock. IDL and Vasquez allegedly refused to give Plaintiff stock. On January 31, 1991, Plaintiff quit and sued Defendants for business fraud and breach of contract.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff contends that no demands or offers were exchanged prior to trial.

Damages

Plaintiff asked the jury to award $670,000 (the current market value of Anderson's 9 percent share of the stock) as well as $500,000 punitive damages against Vasquez and $500,000 punitive damages against IDL. Defendant contends that Plaintiff asked (in his complaint) for general damages in an amount exceeding $600,000 and punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the Court.

Injuries

Emotional distress.

Other Information

This was the second trial of the same case. The Court of Appeals reversed Defendants' nonsuit granted in the first trial.

Deliberation

2 days

Poll

12-0 compensatory, 9-3 malice, 12-0 fraud

Length

7 days


#121571

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390