This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Business Law
Unfair Competition
Consumer Protection

People of the State of California, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California v. Frito-Lay Inc., Burger King, Heinz, Kettle Foods, KFC, Lance, McDonald's, Procter & Gamble, Wendy's

Published: Oct. 11, 2008 | Result Date: Aug. 1, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC338956 Settlement –  $6,869,000

Court

L.A. Superior Central West


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Deborah R. Slon

Laura J. Zuckerman

Edward G. Weil


Defendant

Trenton H. Norris
(Hogan Lovells)

Gary M. Roberts
(Dentons US LLP)

Michele B. Corash
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)

Nancy S. Cohen

Richard C. Coffin
(Barg Coffin Lewis & Trapp LLP)

Norman C. Hile
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

Jeffrey H. Dasteel

Forrest A. Hainline III
(Goodwin Procter LLP)


Facts

The People of the State of California brought an action against McDonald's, Wendy's, Burger King, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Frito-Lay, Kettle Foods, Lance, Procter & Gamble, and Heinz for sale of potato chips and french fries containing high levels of acrylamide, a known carcinogen.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs claimed unlawful business practices under the Unfair Competition Law. They also alleged violations of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (aka Proposition 65), which provides that businesses must supply a reasonable and clear warning prior to distributing products that expose the public to chemicals like acrylamide.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants denied all claims.

Damages

Plaintiffs requested civil penalties as well as injunctive relief.

Result

Defendants Kentucky Fried Chicken, McDonald's, Wendy's, and Burger King consented to providing warnings for acrylamide in their restaurants. KFC paid plaintiffs $341,000, Wendy's paid $342,000, and Burger King paid $1,250,000 for civil penalties and costs. Burger King paid an additional $700,000 to the private plaintiff. McDonald's compensated plaintiffs $1,641,000 for civil penalties and costs, along with $700,000 to the private plaintiff. Procter & Gamble consented to reduce the amount of acrylamide so that warnings would not be needed and also compensated plaintiffs with $750,000 for civil penalties and costs, including a possible increase of $1 million in the event that reduction targets are not attained. Frito-Lay, Kettle Foods, Heinz, and Lance consented to reduce acrylamide levels, and also paid civil penalties and costs before the start of trial. Frito-Lay agreed to pay $1.5 million, and an additional $2 million in the event that reduction targets are not attained, to be reduced by $550,000 if reduction targets are attained within half the time required. Kettle Foods agreed to give $350,000, Lance agreed to give $95,000, and Heinz agreed to give $600,000. The total awarded amount equaled $6,869,000.


#121597

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390