Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles v. Lucille A. Loyce, Donald J. Smith
Published: Nov. 29, 2008 | Result Date: Nov. 4, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC361111 Verdict – $528,000
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Charles E. Slyngstad Jr.
(Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP)
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
Michael De Castro
(technical)
Thomas M. Neches
(technical)
Defendant
Anthony E. Reading Ph.D.
(medical)
Stephanie R. Rizzardi-Pearson
(technical)
Facts
Plaintiff Housing Authority of the city of Los Angeles sued its former long time executive director, Donald J. Smith, and its former assistant executive director, Lucille A. Loyce, contending that while defendants were acting as the top two executives of the agency, they caused the Authority to pay consultant, Dwayne E. Williams, who worked at the Authority's Jordan Downs and Pueblo Del Rio developments, excessive compensation.
The plaintiff also alleged intentional misrepresentation and constructive fraud regarding the oversight as well as monitoring of contracting activities at the developments or with Dwayne E. Williams / D.E. Williams & Associates.
Result
The jury found that the defendants made false representations to and concealed facts from the Housing Authority's Board of Commissioners, which caused damages in the amount of $528,000. Verdict for plaintiff as cross-defendant on cross-complaint by Loyce involving discrimination and whistleblowing allegations. The plaintiff recovered against defendant Loyce for breach of fiduciary duty, intentional misrepresentation and constructive fraud, and against defendant Smith for intentional misrepresentation and constructive fraud.
Other Information
EXPERT TESTIMONY: Thomas Neches, testified to the $1.17 million paid to consultant by the Housing Authority, which exceeded defendants' representation. James Rosenberg, M.D., testified that defendant Loyce was a malingerer. June Hagen testified that defendant Loyce could have obtained other employment and made little effort to do so. FILING DATE: Oct. 30, 2006.
Deliberation
two days
Poll
9-3 (for plaintiff Housing Authority as to claims on which it prevailed), 11-1 (for cross-defendant Housing Authority on cross-complaint for race), 12-0 (for gender discrimination) and 10-2 (Labor Code section 1102.5 whistleblowing by Loyce as cross-complainant)
Length
23 days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390