Frank Caruso v. City of Irvine, David L. Maggard Jr., Robert Richardson, and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Published: Dec. 13, 2008 | Result Date: Aug. 20, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 8:07-cv-00011-DOC RNB Bench Decision – Defense
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Jennifer M. Rosner
(Liebert, Cassidy & Whitmore)
J. Scott Tiedemann
(Liebert Cassidy Whitmore)
Facts
Plaintiff Frank Caruso was a police officer for the city of Irvine since 2001. In 2006, plaintiff applied for a field training officer position (FTO) twice. He was denied both times.
Caruso sued the city of Irvine, Chief of Police David Maggard and Field Training Officer Lieutenant Robert Richardson alleging retaliation pursuant to 42 USC section 1983 and the First Amendment.
The city of Irvine was later dismissed from the lawsuit.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that because he was a vocal and active member of the Irvine Police Association in regards to officer morale issues and employment conditions, he was passed over for the FTO position.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed that they did not take any adverse action against plaintiff because of his association activities. Moreover, defendants could not be held liable because they were not direct participants in the decision to not select plaintiff for the FTO assignment. Finally, defendants were entitled to qualified immunity.
Result
Defendants were granted summary judgment.
Other Information
Court awarded $9055.45 in costs to defendants.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390