This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Failure to Account for an Accounting and Book Account

Terrance D. Rutherford, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals v. FIA Card Services, N.A., (Bank of America), Alaska Airlines Inc., Horizon Air Industries Inc.

Published: Sep. 27, 2014 | Result Date: Sep. 5, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:13-cv-02934-DDP-MAN Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Louis M. Marlin
(Louis Marlin Mediation)

Kristen M. Fritz

Stephen P. O'Dell
(Marlin & Saltzman LLP)

Thomas A. Cifarelli
(The Cifarelli Law Firm)


Defendant

Robert S. Stern

Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson

Tritia M. Murata
(Davis, Wright & Tremaine LLP)

David E. Snyder
(First Amendment Coalition)

Dale K. Larson
(Strumwasser & Woocher LLP)


Facts

Terrance Rutherford brought a lawsuit against FIA Card Services N.A., Alaska Airlines Inc., and Horizon Air Industries Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff worked for Alaska Airlines and that FIA issued "Alaska Airlines" brand credit cards. Plaintiff alleged that he took part in an incentive program, by which he distributed credit card applications and was supposed to receive certain payments when those applications were submitted or approved. Plaintiff further alleged that he was not paid all monies due to him under the incentive program.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants agued that plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed because it failed to show that defendants owe him money. Alaska Airlines argued that the complaint failed to allege that specifically Alaska Airlines owed plaintiff money.

Result

The court granted all defendants' motions to dismiss. The court held, in part that plaintiff's complaint failed to allege Alaska Airlines actually pays employees for the incentive program. The court also held that the complaint failed to show that plaintiff and FIA had the type of relationship that would establish an independent accounting claim. The court dismissed plaintiff's second amended complaint with prejudice.

Other Information

FILING DATE: April 25, 2013.


#122406

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390