This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Dangerous Condition of Public Property

Michael Thiry and Karen Thiry v. State of California, Ibrahim Aldridge, and Does 1 through 50

Published: Oct. 25, 2014 | Result Date: Mar. 31, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SCV 251518 Settlement –  $5,265,000

Court

Sonoma Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael A. Fiumara

Tad S. Shapiro


Defendant

Patrick Petersen

Karl H. Schmidt
(California Dept. of Transportation)

Timothy P. Murphy
(Edrington, Schirmer & Murphy LLP)


Facts

Michael Thiry and Karen Thiry sued the State of California and Ibrahim Aldridge.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged Aldridge was driving on a highway, at a time when it had been raining heavily for two days, and lost control of his vehicle when he drove into standing water that had flooded the roadway. Plaintiffs contended that Aldridge's vehicle hydroplaned cross the median, an 1,100 ft. opening due to left turn pockets, and crashed into Michael Thiry's truck, which then forced Michael's truck to crash into an emergency call box. Plaintiffs alleged that, in addition to Aldridge's negligence, the state created and maintained a dangerous condition where the highway flooded, because it knew that the area was often subject to flooding, due in part to the condition of adjacent property, but failed to remedy the condition and failed to warn the public of the unsafe condition. Plaintiffs argued that documents showed that the state was aware of flooding at the location but did nothing to remedy the conditions that caused the flooding or warn the public.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Aldridge argued that the accident was caused by the state's failure to warn of a dangerous condition. The state argued that it had no notice of frequent flooding.

The state also argued that the roadway was not dangerous because there was no wet weather accident history at the location, and that Aldridge's driving at an unsafe speed in the rain caused the accident.

Damages

Michael Thiry claimed he suffered $4,020,000 in damages from past and future medical costs and past and future loss of earnings. The state did not contest the physical injuries, but contended the loss of earning capacity claim was substantially less that plaintiffs claimed. Plaintiffs sought damages for past and future pain and suffering. Karen Thiry claimed loss of consortium.

Injuries

Michael Thiry claimed that as a result of the accident he suffered lower extremity fractures to his legs, ankles, and feet, requiring multiple surgeries. Thiry claimed residual pain and disability from his occupation as an auto mechanic.

Result

The parties settled the case for a total of $5,265,000. Aldridge agreed to pay his policy limits of $15,000 and the state agreed to pay $5,250,000.


#122446

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390