This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Unfair Business Practices
Wage and Hour

Nataly Makabi, Sivan Cohen, Maor Batito, Udi Berdugo, Or Takaev, Ekaterina Avashurova, Roee Lavi, as individuals and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Aroma Bakery Cafe Inc., a California corporation dba Aroma Bakery & Cafe, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Oct. 25, 2014 | Result Date: Apr. 4, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC468146 Bench Decision –  $499,229

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jennifer Kramer

Robert A. Ackermann

Ricardo Chavez

James H. Cordes
(James H. Cordes and Associates)


Defendant

Eli M. Kantor
(Eli M Kantor Law Offices)


Facts

Plaintiffs Nataly Makabi, Sivan Cohen, Maor Batito, Udi Berdugo, Or Takaev, Ekaterina Avashurova, and Roee Lavi, worked as servers for defendants Aroma Bakery Cafe Inc., a California corporation doing business as Aroma Bakery & Café restaurants, in Hollywood and Encino. Plaintiffs claimed defendants didn't pay them adequate wages.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Server plaintiffs, all immigrants from Israel, claimed they worked for tips only, and that defendants paid no wages. The seventh plaintiff, a hostess, claimed she worked for cash wages that did not include overtime. Plaintiffs claimed that they were entitled to be paid minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime wages for overtime hours worked and were not provided lawful meal or real breaks.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed that plaintiffs were paid via mandatory service charges, not tips that were added to customer bills. Defendants asserted that plaintiffs were provided meal and rest breaks.

Result

The court awarded $499,229 in unpaid wages and prejudgment interest collectively for all seven plaintiffs against the corporate defendants. The court ordered a permanent injunction against the individual defendants. The court found that the servers worked for tips only, without payment of wages and the hostess received only cash wages without overtime. The court also found that plaintiffs were not provided with meal and rest breaks.

Other Information

As prevailing parties, plaintiffs were awarded reasonable fees and costs under Labor Code sections 226 and 1194 in the amount of $476,866. FILING DATE: Aug. 25, 2011.


#122468

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390