This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Dec. 9, 2003

Construction Law
Unfair Business Practices
Free Speech

Confidential

Settlement –  $1,500,000

Judge

David A. Garcia

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Roderick P. Bushnell
(Law Offices of Roderick P. Bushnell)

Patrick J. Coughlin
(Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP)

Alan M. Caplan

Philip Neumark


Defendant

James N. Penrod


Facts

In 1997, Nike Inc. began a public relations campaign to improve its image regarding labor practices in foreign factories. It had been accused of committing several labor law violations in Asia and Southeast Asia by journalists and labor activists. In letters to newspapers and in public statements, Nike sought to portray itself as a conscientious and fair employer that cared for the welfare of all its employees. Nike made specific claims about employee benefits. It stated workers were protected from and not subject to corporal punishment and/or sexual abuse. Nike claimed its products were made according to local workplace safety and wage laws, and that Nike factory workers in Southeast Asia were paid twice the minimum wage in that region. It stated workers received free meals and healthcare. Nike further asserted that it operated morally according to the Good Works International report and Nike guaranteed a living wage for all workers who produced Nike goods.

Damages

The plaintiff sought an injunction to enjoin defendant from failing to disgorge all monies acquired by unlawful and unfair business practices; failing and refusing to undertake a public information campaign to correct any Nike statement or claim that the court finds misleading or deceitful; making misrepresentations regarding the working conditions under which Nike products are made, such as wages, hours, overtime, environmental, health and safety conditions; and the use of child labor to produce its products. The plaintiff also sought attorney fees and costs.

Result

In lieu of an injunction, the action settled for $1.5 million. The settlement proceeds will be paid to the Fair Labor Association, Washington D.C., for program operations and worker development programs on education and economic opportunity.


#122969

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390