Regina Lazo, Alex Lazo, Marc Lazo v. Mobil Oil Refining Corp., Exxon Mobil Corp.
Published: Jun. 21, 2014 | Result Date: May 30, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 2:14-cv-01072-ABC-JC Bench Decision – Dismissal
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Marc Y. Lazo
(K&L Law Group)
Defendant
Lawrence P. Riff
(Los Angeles County Superior Court)
Jason Levin
(Steptoe & Johnson LLP)
Facts
Regina Lazo and others sued Mobil Oil Refining Corp. for wrongful death.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs argued that Youssef Lazo, a family member, was exposed to toxic chemicals during his employment with Mobil. As a result, Youssef developed acute myeloid leukemia, a degenerative disease that culminated in his death.
Plaintiffs asserted claims for wrongful death, negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, loss of consortium, and failure to warn. After their initial claims were dismissed, they filed an amended complaint, adding an additional claim for fraudulent concealment.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Mobil removed the case from state court, defeated a motion to remand, and moved under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the suit arguing that the claims were barred because California workers' compensation law provided an exclusive remedy and plaintiffs' allegations fit no exception. After plaintiffs filed their amended complaint, Mobil filed another motion to dismiss for lack of plausibility, and argued that plaintiffs' amended complaint did not cure the defects that originally lead to dismissal.
Result
The court granted Mobil's motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiffs' allegations were more about alleged "knowledge of the risk" and not "actual knowledge of the injury," and therefore fell short of Rule 9's specificity requirements for pleading fraud.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390