This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Aug. 20, 2002

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Negligence
Product Defects

Confidential

Settlement –  $775,000

Judge

Cesar C. Sarmiento

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Natasha Roit


Defendant

Daniel G. Bath

Peter W. Felchlin

Nancy N. Potter
(Murchison & Cumming)

Joyce S. Mendlin

Mark C. Waterman
(Dimaculangan & Associates)


Experts

Plaintiff

Robert F. Foran
(medical)

Robert J. Cunitz
(technical)

Gary L. Buffington
(technical)

Defendant

Robert Wilson
(technical)

Martin M. Balaban Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiff, a 50-year-old baggage handler employed by Delta, was helping his nephew clear out a house and
had rented a roll off bin through the defendant hauling company.
When the truck driver arrived with the bin, he experienced trouble navigating backwards into the driveway,
and the plaintiff assisted him with hand signals.
The driver signaled that he had finished moving, and the plaintiff then walked between the truck and the bin to
unhook it.
At that the truck lurched forward, and dragged the bin over the plaintiff's foot. The
plaintiff's leg had to be amputated beneath the knee.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff submitted a CCP Section 998 demands for $1,085,000.

Injuries

Amputation of leg below the knee and loss of consortium.

Other Information

The plaintiff's counsel successfully brought a Motion to have the issue of insurance coverage determined before the liability issue is tried. Cross-Motions for Summary Adjudication were then brought. The plaintiff argued that, despite the exclusion, the insurance policy did provide coverage on the theory of "concurrent causes," i.e. because there may also be a defect in the bin and the bin was covered, and the fact that the bin was pulled by the automobile did not eliminate coverage. The Court granted the plaintiff's motion and determined that coverage did exist. The defendant brought a writ and the case settled one day prior to trial.


#123408

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390