This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Declaratory Relief
Unlawful Detainer

Michael Frakes, Tami Frakes v. Herbert J. Milligan

Published: Jun. 28, 2005 | Result Date: May 31, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC314188 Bench Decision –  $0

Judge

Ernest G. Williams

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael Leight


Defendant

John A. Bunnett


Experts

Defendant

John Rydell
(technical)

Facts

On Oct. 30, 2002, the plaintiffs and the defendant entered into a written lease agreement which contained an option to allow the plaintiffs to purchase a single-family residence from the defendant. After the defendant refused to accept further rental and option payments from them and sought to evict them, they filed a suit for declaratory relief. The defendant cross-complained and had filed two separate unlawful detainer proceedings seeking to evict them from the property.

Settlement Discussions

The defendant wanted to increase the option price by approximately $100,000. The plaintiffs declined.

Other Information

A judgment has been entered declaring that the plaintiffs are entitled to enforce an option provision in a written lease and to purchase a single-family residence located in Lynwood by paying the defendant the monies necessary to pay the balance of $43,000 mortgage, less past due real property taxes, together with an additional $57,000 as payment in full for the property. The defendant, age 76, is permitted to continue to live in his trailer on the property for the remainder of his life, without paying rent, but he is responsible to pay his own telephone bill and his proportionate share of any utilities including, without limitation, water, electricity, gas and refuse disposal. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant on his cross-complaint which sought to evict the plaintiffs from his property and to declare that they had no right to purchase it.


#123686

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390