This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Age Discrimination
Retaliation

Roy Broce v. ARCO Pipeline Company, et al.

Published: Mar. 18, 2003 | Result Date: Jan. 8, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: NC021115 Bench Decision –  $0

Judge

Judith A. Vander Lans

Court

L.A. Superior Long Beach


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dennis E. Nelson


Defendant

Princeton H. Kim

W. Joseph Strapp


Facts

The plaintiff asserted claims for discrimination, retaliation, harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from his employment at defendant Arco Pipeline Company (ARCO). ARCO denied the plaintiff's claims in their entirety.

Settlement Discussions

WERE THERE ANY SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS?


#123795

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390