This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Professional Malpractice
Broker Negligence
Failure to Warn

Ador and Rowena Lopez v. Jose Enos & Associates, et al.

Published: Jul. 26, 1997 | Result Date: May 19, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV542726 Verdict –  $0

Judge

George L. Nelson

Court

Sacramento Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David G. Knitter


Defendant

Nelson C. Barry III
(Law Office of Nelson C Barry III)


Experts

Plaintiff

Noel M. Lerner
(technical)

Clark Wallace
(technical)

Defendant

Geoff Zimmerman
(technical)

Facts

In September 1991, the defendant broker, Joseph Enos, represented plaintiff Ador Lopez and the defendant seller in a dual agency real estate transaction. The defendant seller sold the plaintiff a three-acre parcel with underground gas storage tanks. After the sale was completed, the tanks were removed and contamination was discovered. The plaintiff demanded rescission from the defendant seller and sued defendant Enos for malpractice. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants based on professional negligence and malpractice, fraud, rescission and breach of fiduciary duty theories of recovery. The defendant seller settled before trial.

Settlement Discussions

The settlement discussions were not disclosed.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed $150,000 in damages.

Other Information

A mediation was held in September 1995 before a local attorney. A settlement conference was held on April 3, 1996 in Dept. 31 of Sacramento Superior Court. Neither resolved the matter. Defendant Enos filed a motion for attorney's fees, which was denied on grounds that the broker was not a party to the sales contract. Defendant Enos has appealed this ruling. The first trial, which lasted four days, resulted in a mistrial before the close of evidence. The second trial lasted three days.

Length

3 days


#124067

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390