This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Labor Code Violation
Retaliation

Jones Joyce Cline v. Majesty Management, et al.

Published: Jan. 27, 2004 | Result Date: Dec. 11, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC282570 Bench Decision –  $0

Judge

Kenneth R. Freeman

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael B. Eisenberg

Elizabeth Thaler


Defendant

Gregory E. Stone
(Stone Dean LLP)


Facts

The plaintiff, Joyce Cline, was hired as a manicurist and facialist for the defendant's Health Club and Spa on Aug. 22, 2001. After she received her first paycheck, she claimed to management that she was not paid appropriately based upon what she stated was the agreed compensation. She also claimed at a sales meeting with several employees present that the defendant violated the Labor Code by underpaying all of its employees in that cosmetologists are deemed "professionals" under the Labor Code and entitled to twice as much compensation as that which was actually being paid. The plaintiff was reprimanded for attempting to stir things up and she was asked to bring up the issues and her concerns within a private setting. The defendant then insisted that the plaintiff sign a new compensation agreement setting forth her specific compensation so as to avoid any further confusion. The plaintiff signed the agreement. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed a claim with the Labor Board alleging that the defendant had violated her rights. The plaintiff then stated that her schedule was changed and her appointments cancelled in retaliation for her filing a labor board claim. There was some confusion and inconsistencies as to whether the defendant ever received the claim. One manager stated that she was aware of the claim before the plaintiff's employment ended. The plaintiff came on the premises, clocked in and requested her final check. The plaintiff then dropped her labor board claim and filed a civil action.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $36,000 at the mediation and defendant offered $3,000. The plaintiff's demand was raised to $52,000 prior to trial. The defendants offered $25,000 prior to trial and the plaintiff proposed a $37,500 settlement before trial. The case did not settle.

Specials in Evidence

$38,000

Damages

The plaintiff claimed loss of earnings, punitive damages, emotional distress damages and attorneys fees pursuant to state.

Result

Judgment for the defendants on all three causes of action.


#124459

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390