This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Copyright Infringement

Everette Silas, Sherri Littleton v. Home Box Office Inc., Stephen Levinson, Mark Wahlberg, Dwayne Johnson, Bucks Entertainment Inc., Leverage Management Inc., and Does 1 to 10, inclusive

Published: Sep. 17, 2016 | Result Date: Jul. 26, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:15-cv-09732-GW-FFM Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kenechi Agu
(Law Offices of Kenechi R Agu)


Defendant

Sarah L. Cronin
(Venable LLP)

Lee S. Brenner
(Venable LLP)

Kenneth D. Kronstadt


Facts

Everette Silas and Sherri Littleton sued Home Box Office Inc., Stephen Levinson, Mark Wahlberg, Dwayne Johnson, Bucks Entertainment Inc., and Leverage Management Inc., in connection with the HBO Original Series "Ballers."

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs wrote the script entitled "Off Season", which they pitched to several individuals in late 2008-early 2009. Though there was expressed interest, talks fizzled because they were unwilling to give plaintiffs "created by" credits. Plaintiffs alleged on information and belief that those individuals shared some of plaintiffs' materials with individuals who would later become involved in the HBO series. After "Ballers" premiered several years later, plaintiffs claimed it was substantially similar to "Off Season". Plaintiff asserted a cause of action for copyright infringement.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied there was any similarity in protectable expression between plaintiff's works and "Ballers". Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint.

Result

The trial court concluded that there was no similarity of protectable expression between the works, and that plaintiffs therefore could never state a claim for infringement, and granted defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice.


#125135

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390