This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Civil Rights
Race Discrimination

Daisy Jaffe, Denise Williams, Margaret Benay Curtis-Bauer, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, fka Morgan Stanley DW Inc.

Published: Apr. 12, 2008 | Result Date: Feb. 7, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C-06-3903 TEH Settlement –  $16,000,000

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kelly M. Dermody
(Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein LLP)

Adam T. Klein

James M. Finberg
(Altshuler Berzon LLP)


Defendant

Mark S. Dichter

L. Julius M. Turman


Facts

From Oct. 12, 2002 to Dec. 3, 2007, members of the plaintiff class, which included African-American and Latino Financial Advisors and registered financial advisor trainees, worked for Morgan Stanley, defendant, in the Global Wealth Management Group. The representative plaintiff sued defendant under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 on the basis of racial discrimination.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The representative plaintiff argued that she was discriminated against on the basis of race when defendant offered her and other class members fewer business opportunities than comparable white financial advisors and registered financial advisor trainees. She argued they were discriminated against in compensation and assignment policies.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that plaintiff and the class were not discriminated against on the basis of race.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought in excess of $36 million for race-based compensation disparities.

Result

The case settled for $16 million plus interest from the date of preliminary approval. Defendant also agreed to the following: to distribute its non-discrimination and anti-harassment policy to all employees, to provide employees mandatory training, to maintain its commitment to increasing recruiting and outreach to enhance diversity in the financial advisor position, and to make manager compensation tied to diversity measurements. Defendant further agreed to change the process of how accounts are distributed to financial advisors so that greater emphasis would be placed on current performance. Moreover, the defendant promised it would continue its policy not to discriminate on the basis of race or color in hiring, compensation and business opportunity assignments.


#125245

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390