This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Copyright Infringement
Breach of Contract

MGA Entertainment Inc. v. Ubisoft Entertainment S.A.

Published: Apr. 12, 2008 | Result Date: Feb. 8, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Arbitration –  $13,200,000

Court

L.A. Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Douglas A. Winthrop
(Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP)


Defendant

Stephen Coopersmith

Dale Kinsella

Timothy L. Skelton

Suann C. MacIsaac
(Kinsella, Weitzman, Iser, Kump & Aldisert LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff MGA Entertainment Inc. entered into a four-year licensing agreement with defendant Ubisoft Entertainment S.A., a video game manufacturer. Under the agreement, defendant was required to develop video games based on plaintiff's "Bratz Dolls." But in 2003, plaintiff tried to terminate the license, contending defendant failed to meet its obligations under the contract. Nevertheless, defendant continued, for a short period time, to produce the games even after plaintiff terminated the agreement.

The plaintiff filed suit, claiming copyright infringement, trademark infringement and breach of contract.

The defendant filed a countersuit, alleging plaintiff's termination of the license amounted to a breach of contract. The matter proceeded to arbitration. The defendant asserted the parties had agreed on an affordable price for the license, but plaintiff attempted to renegotiate the contractual terms when the Bratz Dolls became popular. The defendant further claimed that when it declined to agree to the new terms, plaintiff terminated the license without cause.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed unspecified compensatory damages, alleging its business suffered irreparable harm due to defendant's infringement. According to defendant's counterclaim, plaintiff's termination of the license agreement resulted in a $20 million loss of potential profits. In addition, defendant sought attorney fees and costs.

Result

The arbitrator found for defendant and awarded it $13.2 million in lost profits, attorney fees and interest.


#125268

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390