This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Construction Law
Song-Beverly Act
Failure to Repair

Pamela Dompe v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.

Published: Mar. 28, 1998 | Result Date: Feb. 26, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC148437 Verdict –  $37,776

Judge

Aurelio N. Muñoz

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert F. Brennan
(Law Offices of Robert F. Brennan APC)


Defendant

Gregg M. Audet
(Office of the Anaheim City Attorney)


Facts

On April 14, 1994, plaintiff Pamela Dompe, purchased a 1994 Mercedes-Benz C 280, with a Mercedes-Benz limited warranty for 48 months or 50,000 miles. In April 1994, she complained of the vehicle pulling to the right. She complained to Mercedes dealerships on several occassions about odd noises, various electrical problems, engine complaints and various fit and finish items. She complained that the vehicle's ABS system did not bring the car to a stop within a reasonable distance. As she owned the car for a longer period, the engine and cooling system began manifesting various problems, including recurring oil leaks and engine coolant leaks. Per the plaintiff, the vehicle's entire cooling system was replaced at one time or another. In all, plaintiff had taken the car in for repairs at Mercedes dealerships a total of over 20 times in almost four years, as of the trial date. While she owned the car, she had three or four minor collisions, all of which were repaired. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on the Song-Beverly Act.

Settlement Discussions

Per the plaintiff, the defendant offered a replacement vehicle in fall 1997 but no attorney fees. Per the defendant, it offered a replacement vehicle with substantial upgrades and no statutory offset. The plaintiff was willing to accept a replacement vehicle and $8,000 in fees at the time.

Damages

The plaintiff requested damages equal to the amount of the purchase price $37,776, plus a civil penalty of up to treble damages.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years after the suit was filed. According to defendants, post-trial discussions with jurors indicated that they found one defect - the vehicle's key sticking in the ignition - and rejected the plaintiff's other defect claims.

Poll

10-2

Length

six days


#125955

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390