This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Breach of Contract
Legal Malpractice
Real Estate

Mohammad Ali and Dacia Burz Djirbandee v. Jerry I. Schaefer, et al.

Published: Jun. 24, 1995 | Result Date: May 31, 1995 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: N63265 –  $0

Judge

Vincent P. DiFiglia

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John R. Sorensen


Defendant

Michael I. Neil
(Neil, Dymott, Frank, McCabe & Hudson)


Experts

Plaintiff

Harvey L. Pedersen
(technical)

Jaime A. Cerros
(technical)

James R. Recht
(technical)

Donald T. Weckstein
(technical)

Defendant

James M. Allen
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiffs Mohammad Ali and Dacia Burz Djirbandee had loaned $170,000 (secured by real property) to an attorney named Boothby who had previously been convicted of a felony and was subsequently admitted to the California Bar. Plaintiffs did not obtain an appraisal of the property securing the loan or do a background check on the borrower, despite knowledge of the felony conviction for fraud on a prior loan application. Plaintiffs went to Defendant Jerry I. Schaefer (of Schaefer & Smith, a professional (law) corporation) a real property expert; he recommended a non-judicial foreclosure which would not allow for a deficiency judgment because it was faster and, under the circumstances, more convenient. Plaintiffs foreclosed at a non-judicial sale on June 29, 1993. After taking possession of the property, Plaintiffs found evidence of ownership of a trust deed in the amount of $100,000 on the part of Boothby and wanted to proceed against Boothby for fraud.

Settlement Discussions

Defendant contends Plaintiff offered to settle for $60,000 early in the litigation.

Damages

Initially punitive damages were claimed; but the case went to the jury on the property damage, slightly in excess of $100,000.

Deliberation

2.5 hours

Poll

10-2

Length

7 days


#126031

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390