This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Slip and Fall

Maria Dominguez v. Westfield Santa Anita Shoppingtown LLC, Nationwide Janitorial Services Inc.

Published: Jun. 23, 2017 |

Case number: BC592749 Bench Decision –  Nonsuit

Judge

C. Edward Simpson Jr.

Court

L.A. Superior Pasadena


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gilbert Perez III
(Law Offices of Mauro Fiore Jr.)


Defendant

Timothy J. Lippert
(Demler, Armstrong & Rowland)


Experts

Plaintiff

Lawrence S. Miller M.D.

Defendant

Anthony F. Feuerman M.D.

Facts

On Sept. 6, 2013, plaintiff Maria Dominguez, 41, slipped and fell on a yellow liquid in the common area of the Westfield Santa Anita Mall in front of the Walking Company store on the lower level. Plaintiff sued Westfield and Nationwide Janitorial Services Inc. for personal injuries.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended she suffered injuries as a result of the fall. Plaintiff asserted claims of premises liability and negligence against the defendants, contending the flooring was unsafe when wet.
According to plaintiff, nonsuit was granted due to a significant change in the subject flooring between the time of the incident and the time of plaintiff's expert's inspection of the premises. Plaintiff's expert conducted an inspection of the newly installed flooring only.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Electronic patrol log records showed that the incident location was inspected about 10 minutes prior to plaintiff's fall, and plaintiff's accident reconstruction expert did not have any criticisms of defendants' cleaning/inspection procedures. Instead, plaintiff's expert claimed that the mall's tile flooring was unsafe when wet, based on his slip resistance testing performed in February 2017. Prior to the close of plaintiff's case, the general manager of the mall testified that approximately 1.67 million visitors walked through the subject location in 2013 and there was only one other slip and fall in the area that year. The mall manager further testified that the tile was replaced in 2014 for reasons having nothing to do with safety. Defendants argued that the testing performed by plaintiff's expert (on the new tile) was irrelevant.

Plaintiff's medical expert testified that plaintiff was suffering from chronic pain syndrome and would benefit from a multidisciplinary pain management program costing $1,500 per day. However, on cross-examination plaintiff's medical expert admitted that her treatment was excessive and most of the injections she received were not medically indicated after the first injection made her symptoms worse.

Defendants then moved for a nonsuit on the grounds that plaintiff had failed to introduce any evidence of negligence on the part of defendants. The motion was granted and the jury was dismissed.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $235,000. Defendant made a CCP 998 offer of $40,000.

Damages

Plaintiff claimed $85,000 (all lien).

Injuries

Plaintiff claimed constant intractable lower back pain, which did not respond to extensive chiropractic treatment, physical therapy, and multiple epidural/facet block injections.

Result

Defendant's motion for judgment of nonsuit was granted.


#126154

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390