This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Violation of Proposition 65

Russell Brimer v. Mafcote Inc., Royal Consumer Products LLC, and Does 1 to 150, inclusive

Published: Jul. 7, 2017 | Result Date: Apr. 12, 2017 | Filing Date: Apr. 20, 2016 |

Case number: 16CV294141 Settlement –  $26,500

Court

Santa Clara Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brian C. Johnson
(Tyson & Mendes LLP)

Clifford A. Chanler
(The Chanler Group)


Defendant

Michael K. Johnson
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Facts

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants for civil penalties and injunctive relief pursuant to Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff contended that defendants manufactured, imported, sold, or distributed for sale in California vinyl/PVC poster carriers that contained the toxic chemicals di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, also known as DEHP, and/or vinyl lettering that contained diisononyl phthalate, also known as DINP, without the requisite Proposition 65 health warnings.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's allegations and contended that its products were in compliance with the law.

Result

Pursuant to the settlement reached between the parties, defendant will only purchase for sale, manufacture for sale, or import for sale in California products that have been reformulated to contain DEHP in concentrations of less than 1,000 parts per million and DINP in concentrations of less than 1,000 parts per million. Non-reformulated products must contain clear and reasonable warnings. Defendant will also pay $6,000 in civil penalties, with 75 percent paid to the California Office of Health Hazard Assessment and the remaining 25 percent paid to plaintiff. The final civil payment of $4,000 will be waived if defendant provides written certification by a certain date that its products have been reformulated. Additionally, defendant will reimburse plaintiff $20,500 for his attorney fees and costs.


#126250

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390