This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Breach of Duty

Charles P. Reilly v. American Medical International, Inc.

Published: Apr. 20, 1995 | Result Date: Feb. 15, 1995 |

Case number: C737088 –  $2,109,220

Judge

Reginald A. Dunn

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Randi Maurer

Douglas L. Thorpe


Defendant

John B. Quinn
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)

Arpie B. Balekjian


Facts

On or about September 1, 1984, Plaintiff Charles P. Reilly and Defendant American Medical International, Inc., entered into an employment agreement which provided that upon the occurrence of a change of control, i.e., when "any person or group acquires more than 20 percent of AMI's shares," (1) Reilly is entitled to receive a bonus payment; (2) Reilly shall be vested at a higher level in AMI's supplemental executive retirement plan (3) all AMI stock options granted to Reilly shall become exercisable. On September 3, 1985, Reilly and AMI entered into a letter agreement which extended the term of the agreement through August 31, 1988. On June 11, 1986, Reilly and AMI terminated Reilly's employment by an agreement which provided that Reilly would remain an inactive employee of AMI through August 31, 1988 and that the provisions of the employment agreement relating to changes in control of AMI would remain in effect through August 31, 1988. Reilly is now 53 years of age and his position with AMI was that of executive vice president.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff contends he demanded $1,388,333 and Defendant offered $600,000.

Damages

$820,000 for the bonus payment; $122,500 for stock options Plaintiff would have been entitled to exercise; $1,229,404 for the present value of his increased interest in AMI's supplemental executive retirement plan; and prejudgment interest from August 31, 1988.

Other Information

This case was filed by Plaintiff on September 12, 1989; five years and five months prior to this result.

Deliberation

2.5 weeks

Poll

9-3

Length

2.5 weeks


#126386

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390