This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Dec. 14, 1995

Breach of Contract
Loan Agreement
Promissory Notes

Confidential

Settlement –  $1,000,000

Judge

Stephen M. Lachs

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Marc Gentry Penso


Defendant

Marshall August

Howard S Fredman
(Fredman Lieberman & Pearl LLP)


Facts

On August 29, 1988, the defendants loaned the plaintiffs real estate developers $3,500,000 for the construction, rehabilitation and lease finance of a retail shopping center located in Rancho Palos Verdes. The loan was made through a promissory note secured by a deed of trust which encumbered the ground lease underlying the improvements of the project. The plaintiffs signed a completion agreement and guaranty. The deed of trust matured on August 28, 1988. On February 28, 1992, the defendants demanded payment of the principal and interest. No payment was made. The plaintiffs defaulted on the ground lease and a judgment was obtained against plaintiffs for restitution of the premises by the lessor, which extinguished the lien of the deed of trust. At that time, the promissory note became unsecured. In 1993, the plaintiffs sued the defendant lender under breach of contract, lender liability, and fraud theories of liability alleging that the lender falsely represented that it would fund 100% of the cost of the shopping center. The defendant lender filed a cross-complaint for breach of note, breach of guaranty and money paid.

Settlement Discussions

The defendant claimed it was owed approximately $5,000,000 for this action and money on an unrelated judgment entered against the plaintiff. The settlement required the plaintiff to pay $1,000,000 in exchange for a dismissal and the elimination of the prior judgments. Per the defendant, the settlement was reached after plaintiff's assets were examined.

Damages

The defendant claimed that approximately $5,000,000 was owed to it in this action at the time of judgment. The plaintiff claimed $2,000,000 in damages.

Other Information

The case was settled 2 years and 7 months after it was filed.


#126454

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390