Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
Published: May 19, 2011 | Result Date: Feb. 26, 2011 |Case number: 2:2007-cv-00403 Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Texas
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Robert C. Bunt
(Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth PC)
Defendant
David T. Pritikin
(Sidley Austin LLP)
David A. Perlson
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Charles K. Verhoeven
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Amy H. Candido
(Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati)
Jennifer H. Doan
(Haltom & Doan)
Brian C. Cannon
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Joshua R. Thane
(Haltom & Doan)
Matthew D. Powers
(O'Melveny & Myers LLP)
Yen P. Nguyen
(California Dept. of Justice)
Andrew L. Perito
(Durie Tangri LLP)
Bryan K. Anderson
(Office of the Santa Clara County Counsel)
Antonio R. Sistos
(Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Douglas E. Lumish
(Latham & Watkins LLP)
Facts
Paid Search Engine Tools filed a patent infringement claim against Yahoo!, Google, and Microsoft. The lawsuit related to U.S. Patent No 7,043,450 involving Internet advertising technologies.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Result
The court ruled that all but two dependent claims were invalid for anticipation in light of prior art. Thus, it ruled in favor of all defendants. Further, plaintiff later dropped its two remaining claims.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390