This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Breach of Contract

Edgar Morales, Marco Ponce v. Peck Jeep Eagle Inc. dba Midway Jeep Chrysler

Published: Jul. 14, 2017 | Result Date: Nov. 15, 2016 |

Case number: 37-2012-00103823-CU-OE-CTL Bench Decision –  $127,749

Judge

Joel M. Pressman

Court

San Diego County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Marcus James Jackson
(Law Office of Marcus J. Jackson)


Defendant

R. Anthony Mahavier
(R A Mahavier APLC)


Facts

Edgar Morales and Marco Ponce sued defendant Midway Jeep Chrysler, Peck Jeep Eagle Inc. in relation to an employment dispute.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs argued that defendant, an automobile dealership, wrongfully held commissions and lessened the amount of commissions they earned. Additionally, Morales argued that he was wrongfully terminated after he filed suit.
Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for breach of contract, fraud, violations of the California Labor Code, and sought civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorney General Act, Ca. Labor Code Secs 2698 et seq. The bulk of the amount the judge awarded was in the form of PAGA penalties.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied plaintiff's claims arguing that defendant's commission practice was justified by California law. Defendant also argued that Morales' poor conduct was the reason he was fired. Additionally, defendant contended that plaintiff was aware that plaintiff would be unable to recover since the dealership was sold and going through a Chapter VII bankruptcy proceeding.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiffs offered $450,000 and defense countered with $115,000 under CCP 998.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought recovery for lost commission and civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act. Additionally, Morales sought recovery in an unspecified amount for damages.

Result

The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs on claims regarding labor code violations, unlawful business practices, breach of contract, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court awarded plaintuffs $127,749. The bulk of the amount awarded was in the form of PAGA penalties. Defense verdict on Morales' claims for wrongful termination and plaintiffs' fraudulent concealment and negligent supervision claims.


#127790

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390