This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
42 U.S.C. Section 1983
Prisoner's Rights

David B. Duran v. Omar Mandujo, et al.

Published: Sep. 29, 2017 | Result Date: Aug. 31, 2017 |

Case number: 15-cv-2745-DMS-WVG Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Judge

Dana M. Sabraw

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Pro Per


Defendant

John P. McCormick
(McCormick, Mitchell & Rasmussen, APC)

Konrad M. Rasmussen
(McCormick, Mitchell & Rasmussen, APC)

Nicole Barvie
(McCormick Mitchell & Rasmussen APC)


Facts

On Jan. 14, 2014, plaintiff David Duran was served with a search warrant by defendants El Centro Police Detectives Omar Mandujano and Alfredo Hernandez. Two days later the detectives took him from the detention facility he was being held in to a hospital in Brawley for a blood draw.

Plaintiff filed a Section 1983 action against Officers Mandujano, Alfredo Hernandez, Luis Hernandez, and John Seaman.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed the officers drew his blood without his consent. Plaintiff claimed the defendants used excessive force in trying to obtain his blood. Plaintiff contended Officer Mandujano held him down by the neck.

Plaintiff claimed defendants violated his civil rights by executing an invalid search warrant and using excessive force in executing the invalid warrant.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants denied the allegations and moved to dismiss plaintiff's fourth amended complaint due to plaintiff's failure to state a claim for relief.

Result

The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, recommending defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted.

Other Information

Plaintiff has until Sept. 29 to file objections to the R&R after which the district court will act upon the R&R.


#128210

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390