This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Environmental Protection
Dungeness Crab Fishing

Tri-State Crab Producers Association v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife; California Fish and Game Commission

Published: Oct. 6, 2017 | Result Date: Sep. 13, 2017 |

Case number: CGC-17-557988 Demurrer –  Defense

Judge

Harold E. Kahn

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Petitioner

Dean G. von Kallenbach
(Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC)

Todd W. Blischke
(Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC)


Respondent

Xavier Becerra
(Office of the Attorney General)

Gavin G. McCabe
(Office of the Attorney General)

Marc N. Melnick
(Office of the Attorney General)

Jonathan A. Wiener
(Office of the Attorney General)


Facts

Tri-State Crab Producers sued the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Fish and Game Commission.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF’S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff challenged defendants’ allegedly overbroad interpretation of Fish and Game Code Section 8279.1, a provision that regulates who can participate in crab fisheries in areas that were delayed in opening its season. Plaintiff alleged that fishermen faced potential revocation of their fishing permits after the defendants’ expanded the meaning of the term “delayed,” to include delays that result from tribal or native interests. Plaintiff sought judicial review of the matter and requested a judicial order stating among other things that the term “delayed,” as used in the code, was limited to seasonal delays resulting from crab quality tests.

DEFENDANTS’ CONTENTIONS: The defendants demurred.

Result

The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend because there was no concrete factual dispute, among other things.


#128273

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390