This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Negligence
Negligent Retention, Supervision and Training or Selection of Employees, Agents or Contractors

William J. Marshall IV v. State of California; M. Zulim; A. Cannon; D. Saldana; D. Trejo; M. Sill; W. Vincent; Mitchell Lee Barr Kaufman; County of Fresno; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive

Published: Oct. 13, 2017 | Result Date: Sep. 18, 2017 | Filing Date: Mar. 29, 2017 |

Case number: 16CECG03574 Demurrer –  Defense

Judge

Mark W. Snauffer

Court

Fresno County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Elise R. Sanguinetti
(Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Team LLP)

Jamie G. Goldstein
(Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Team LLP)


Defendant

James D. Weakley
(Weakley & Arendt APC)

Brande L. Gustafson
(Weakley & Arendt LLP)


Facts

On Nov. 3, 2015, U.S. Navy pilot William Marshall, IV, was struck by a vehicle driven by defendant Mitchell Kauffman during a high-speed pursuit with Fresno County Police officers.

Plaintiff sued Kauffman, the State of California, and the County of Fresno, along with California Highway Patrol Officers M. Zulim, A. Cannon, D. Saldana, D. Trejo, M. Sill, and W. Vincent.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: On Nov. 3, 2015, CHP was allegedly informed that methamphetamine was being smoked in defendant Kauffman's vehicle. Officers Cannon and Zulim attempted a traffic stop, which led to a high-speed pursuit joined by the other officers. Kauffman allegedly collided with plaintiff's vehicle while he was being pursued by the officers. Plaintiff sustained serious injuries. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for negligence against the state actors.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendant denied any liability and filed a demurrer on the causes of action asserted against it for negligence and negligent hiring, retention, supervision, or selection of employees, agents or contractors. Overall, the county asserted immunity.

Injuries

Plaintiff was airlifted to the hospital and sustained injuries including brain injury, paralyzed from the neck down and coma.

Result

Finding the county immune from the lawsuit, the court sustained the county's demurrer without leave to amend.


#128304

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390