This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Libel Per Se, Libel Per Quod
Product Disparagement

Music Group Commercial BM Ltd. v. Tony Karavidas, Dave Smith Instruments LLC and Does 1 to 20

Published: Nov. 17, 2017 | Result Date: Oct. 24, 2017 | Filing Date: Jun. 9, 2017 |

Case number: CGC-17-559458 Bench Decision –  Defense

Judge

Harold E. Kahn

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Andrew L. Chang
(Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP)

Joan R. Camagong
(Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP)


Defendant

Stephen M. Hayes
(Hayes, Scott, Bonino, Ellingson, Guslani, Simonson & Clause LLP) for A. Karavidas

Stephen P. Ellingson
(Hayes, Scott, Bonino, Ellingson, Guslani, Simonson & Clause LLP) for A. Karavidas

Jonathan K. Myers
for A. Karavidas

E. Forrest Shryock Jr.
(Vogl, Meredith & Burke LLP) for Dave Smith Instruments

Jonathan P. Varnica
(Vogl Meredith Burke LLP)


Facts

Music Group Commercial BM Ltd. sued Tony Karavidas and others.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Music Group Commercial contended that Dave Smith Instruments LLC was vicariously liable as Karavidas' employer. Music Group Commercial argued that the commercial speech exception barred application of the anti-SLAPP statute.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Dave Smith Instruments and Karavidas each filed an anti-SLAPP motion to strike arguing that Music Group Commercial's claims arose from protected activity. Defendants argued that the public interest prong of the anti-SLAPP statute applied because the statements were posted on a publicly accessible internet forums and related to the public's interest in consumer information. The commercial speech exception did not apply because Dave Smith Instruments, the seller, did not make the alleged statements, and Karavidas, the speaker, is not primarily engaged in the business of selling. Defendants argued that Music Group Commercial's claims did not have a probability of prevailing on the merits because Karavidas' statements were non-actionable opinion made outside the scope of his employment with Dave Smith Instruments.

Result

Karavida’s motion was granted.


#128542

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390