This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

John M. Floyd & Associates Inc. v. First Imperial Credit Union

Published: Nov. 24, 2017 | Result Date: Oct. 25, 2017 | Filing Date: Jul. 20, 2016 |

Case number: 3:16-cv-01851 Summary Judgment –  Defense in Part

Judge

Dana M. Sabraw

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen L. Schreiner
(Solomon, Ward, Seidenwurm & Smith LLP)

Michael D. Breslauer
(Solomon, Ward, Seidenwurm & Smith LLP)


Defendant

Jennifer E. Duty
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

Benjamin T. Morton
(Gordon & Rees LLP)


Facts

John M. Floyd & Associates Inc., a consulting firm, sued First Imperial Credit Union, a financial institution. JMFA agreed to implement an overdraft privilege program for the credit union in three steps. First, JMFA would provide the credit union with recommendations for implementing the program. Next, JMFA would review its recommendations with the credit union and would devise a plan to implement the program. As a final step, JMFA would implement the program. The credit union also agreed to compensate JMFA on a contingency basis. After JMFA completed the three steps with the credit union, the program did not become operational. In 2009, the credit union hired a new CEO who unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate the contingency fee with JMFA. As a result, the CEO informed JMFA that the credit union would not use JMFA's program. In 2012, the credit union implemented a third party's overdraft program.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: JMFA brought claims against the credit union for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and unfair competition.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: The defendants moved for summary judgment on JMFA's claims for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, and declaratory relief.

Result

The court granted the credit union's motion but only a partial summary judgment. The plaintiff's unfair competition claim survives under two prongs of the unfair competition law.


#128587

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390