This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Strict Products Liability

Miguel Mendoza v. Queen of the Valley Medical Center; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Blakeslee Electric Inc.; Matrix HG Inc.; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Nov. 24, 2017 | Result Date: Sep. 18, 2017 | Filing Date: Jun. 24, 2016 |

Case number: CGC-16-552708 Settlement –  $10,000

Mediator

Jay C. Horton

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Babak B. Saadian
(Wilshire Law Firm PLC)

Colin M. Jones
(Wilshire Law Firm PLC)

Daniel B. Miller
(Wilshire Law Firm PLC)


Defendant

Ross E. Lampe
(Muro & Lampe Inc.) for Blakeslee Electric Inc.

James M. Nelson
(Donnelly Nelson & Depolo) for Queen of the Valley Medical Center

Arnoldo Barba
(LimNexus LLP) for Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Danielle C. O'Sullivan
(LimNexus LLP) for Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Elizabeth I. Stewart
(Low, Ball & Lynch) for Matrix HG Inc.

Barbara J. Damlos
(Pacific Gas and Electric Company) for Pacific Gas and Electric Company


Facts

Miguel Mendoza sued various defendants including Blakeslee Electric Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: On Jan. 3, 2016, plaintiff was on the roof of Queen of the Valley Medical Center's electrical room to perform roofing repairs. Plaintiff was injured after an arc flash explosion originating from a busway system. Plaintiff sued the medical center, Blakeslee, Matrix HG and PG&E. Plaintiff sued Blakeslee for general negligence.

Plaintiff alleged that the busway system was designed by Blakeslee and argued that Blakeslee had authority to maintain the busway system, and owed him a reasonable duty of care. Mendoza further argued that Blakeslee breached its duty of care by failing to label equipment in the busway system and proximately caused his injuries.

DEFENDANTS’ CONTENTIONS: Blakeslee argued that it was not liable because it did not perform electrical work for the hospital before the explosion occurred. Further, Blakeslee argued that it did not install, own, manufacture, or maintain the busway system.

Result

Blakeslee agreed to pay Mendoza $10,000.

Other Information

The case is ongoing as to other defendants.


#128599

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390