Peter L. Kaufman; Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP v. Prospect Funding
Published: Dec. 29, 2017 | Result Date: Nov. 15, 2017 | Filing Date: May 1, 2017 |Case number: BS169525 Arbitration – Defense
Judge
Court
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Douglas A. Linde
(The Linde Law Firm)
Defendant
Patrick R. Mahoney
(Law Offices of Patrick R. Mahoney PC)
Facts
Peter Kaufman and others sued Prospect Funding. An arbitrator found that Kaufman breached its contract with Prospect and awarded damages.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Kaufman petitioned to vacate the arbitration award arguing that the arbitrator erred in finding a contractual relationship between Kaufman and Prospect. Kaufman further argued that he did not agree to arbitrate and that evidence did not support the damages awarded to Prospect.
DEFENDANTS’ CONTENTIONS: Prospect petitioned to affirm the arbitration award.
Result
Prospect’s petition to affirm the arbitration award was granted. The court found that Kaufman failed to state a ground for relief because relevant case law prevented the court from reviewing the arbitrator’s reasoning and from reviewing the evidence that supported the award. The court also found that Kaufman expressly agreed to arbitrate disputes with Prospect.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390