This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Landlord and Tenant
Wrongful Eviction

Dale Duncan and Marta Munoz Mendoza v. Anne Kihagi (aka Anne Kihage-Swain, Anne Swain, Anna Kihage, Anna Kihage- Swain, Anna Swain), Zoriall LLC, Christina Mwangi, and Does 1-10, Inclusive

Published: Dec. 29, 2017 | Result Date: Oct. 5, 2017 | Filing Date: May 4, 2015 |

Case number: CGC-15-545655 Verdict –  $3,528,000

Judge

Andrew Y. S. Cheng

Court

San Francisco County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven J. McDonald
(Greenstein & McDonald)

Ariel M. Gershon
(Greenstein & McDonald)


Defendant

Richard S. Diestel
(Bledsoe, Diestel, Treppa & Crane LLP)

Karen Y. Uchiyama
(Law Office Karen Y. Uchiyama)


Facts

Plaintiffs Dale Duncan, and his wife, plaintiff Marta Mendoza, filed suit against defendants Anne Kihagi, her sister, Christina Mwangi, and their company, Zoriall LLC, in relation to their eviction from defendants' property.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS: Plaintiffs claimed that after defendants bought the property the electric service, garbage service, storage, laundry, and other common areas were decreased and/or interrupted. On April 17, 2015, plaintiffs received an "owner move-in" eviction notice. Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for harassment and wrongful eviction, in violation of San Francisco's rent-control law. Plaintiffs claimed that Mwangi's owner move-in eviction was fraudulent.

Plaintiffs argued that the San Francisco City Attorney's Office found Kihagi to be one of the most notorious landlords in the area and had allegedly conducted harassment campaigns against various tenants, including displacing rent-controlled tenants from many properties that Kihagi has taken a major financial stake. Plaintiffs claimed that Kihagi had Mwangi took a partial-ownership interest in the property shortly before going forward with plaintiffs' eviction. Once plaintiffs moved out, Mwangi then dispossessed herself of ownership.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS: Defendants argued that the San Francisco Rent Ordinance allowed for the owner move-in. Defendants also contended that plaintiffs continued to reside on the property for over two months well beyond the 60-day notice period.

Result

The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs and awarded them $1,176,000 in total damages. The court later found that per law, based on the jury's factual findings, plaintiffs were entitled to $3,528,000 in damages.

Other Information

Two other tenants who also asserted claims of harassment and wrongful eviction had their cases consolidated with the plaintiffs' case. Plaintiffs' case was severed from the two other tenants by the court, prior to trial.


#128741

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390