Mary Lynn Reynolds Monroy v. Narender Nath Bhatia, M.D., et al.
Published: Jan. 5, 2018 | Result Date: Dec. 5, 2017 | Filing Date: May 27, 2014 |Case number: BC546744 Verdict – Defense
Judge
Court
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Henry B. LaTorraca
(Law Office of Henry B. LaTorraca)
Defendant
Robert L. McKenna III
(Kjar, McKenna & Stockalper LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Craig V. Comiter M.D.
(urology)
Defendant
Christopher M. Tarnay M.D.
(OB/GYN)
Facts
Plaintiff Mary Lynn R. Monroy, 54, suffered from stress urinary incontinence and underwent a mid-urethral sling procedure. She subsequently developed significant complications with the mesh and required multiple surgeries to repair damage.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed that defendant failed to obtain plaintiff's informed consent for the procedure.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS: Defendant claimed that he complied with the standard of care and obtained plaintiff's informed consent for the procedure.
Insurer
The Doctors Company
Damages
Plaintiff claimed $250,000 in general damages.
Result
Defense verdict.
Other Information
The poll was 12-0 for defendant on whether she had given her informed consent to the use of the Boston Scientific Corporation Advantage Fit polypropylene mesh as to the risks, benefits, and alternatives to using mesh, such as an autologous sling or other biologic material, and 10-2 for defendant as to whether Dr. Bhatia permitted Lisa Beth Hirsch, M.D. to perform the sling surgery without plaintiff's informed written consent. Coordinated Case: JCCP4733 on Feb. 24, 2015.
Deliberation
one hour (with a read-back of testimony)
Poll
12-0
Length
six days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390